Penilaian Hasil Penanaman Acacia crassicarpa menggunakan Plot Jalur dan Plot Lingkaran
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55180/jwt.v15i1.2058Kata Kunci:
planting, Plantation quality assessment, sample plotAbstrak
Plantation quality assessment is very important for evaluating the success of seedlings in growth, especially in industrial plantations. This study aims to determine the most effective and accurate plot sampling method for assessing the survival and stocking of Acacia crassicarpa. Two types of sampling plots were compared, namely line plots and circular plots, by recording the number of alive and dead plants, as well as measuring the time required for each plot. Statistical analysis was conducted to present statistical descriptions (mean, standard deviation, standard error, and sampling error). Additionally, an independent samples t-test was performed between plot types, preceded by a Levene's test for homogeneity of variances. The results showed that plant density assessments differed between line plots and circular plots. For survival, there was no significant difference between the two plot types. In terms of time efficiency, line plots were superior because the sample area consisted of straight lines, while circular plots took longer to implement, especially during moving from one to another plot. Therefore, the choice of method depends on the assessment objective. For assessing the success of the plants under study, the strip plot is more stable for assessing plant density
Referensi
Arland, S., Sadjati, E., & Ikhwan, M. (2018). Studi Penerapan Metode Pohon Contoh (Tree Sampling) Dalam Pendugaan Potensi Tegakan Hutan Tanaman Ekaliptus. Wahana Forestra: Jurnal Kehutanan, 13(2), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.31849/forestra.v13i2.1567
Hilwan, I., Santosa, Y., & Nahla, S. (2023). Penentuan Bentuk dan Luas Petak Contoh Optimum Pengukuran Keanekaragaman Jenis Tumbuhan Tingkat Pancang Hutan Pegunungan. Journal of Tropical Silviculture, 14(01), 63–69. https://doi.org/10.29244/j-siltrop.14.01.64-70
Ikhwan, M., Sadjati, E., & Azwin, A. (2017). Perbandingan Teknik Tree Sampling Dan Unit Contoh Lingkaran Dalam Menduga Potensi Tegakan Hutan Tanaman Ekaliptus (Eucalyptus Pellita F. Meull). Wahana Forestra: Jurnal Kehutanan, 12(1), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.31849/forestra.v12i1.197
Jones, C., Van Dongen, A., Harvey, J., & Degenhardt, D. (2022). Field sampling methods on seismic lines: a comparison between circular plots and belt transects. Restoration Ecology, 30(7), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13619
Kershaw Jr., J. A., Ducey, M. J., & Husch, B. (2016). Forest Mensuration (5th ed.). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118902028
Mardiatmoko Gun; J.H. Pietersz; A. Boreel. (2014). Ilmu Ukur Kayu Dan Inventarisasi Hutan. In Suparyanto dan Rosad (Issue November). Badan Penerbit Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Pattimura.
Packalen, P., Strunk, J., Maltamo, M., & Myllymaki, M. (2023). Circular or square plots in ALS-based forest inventories-does it matter? Forestry, 96(1), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpac032
Prentius, W., & Grafström, A. (2022). Environmetrics - 2022 - Prentius - Two‐phase adaptive cluster sampling with circular field plots.pdf. Environmetrics:, 33(5), 1–11.
Purbasari, A., Sumarya, E., & Mardhiyah, R. (2023). Penerapan Metode Studi Waktu Dan Gerak Pada Proses Packing Di Pt. Abc. Sigma Teknica, 6(2), 290–299. https://doi.org/10.33373/sigmateknika.v6i2.5633
Ritter, T., Tockner, A., Krassnitzer, R., Witzmann, S., Gollob, C., & Nothdurft, A. (2024). Optimizing Line-Plot Size for Personal Laser Scanning: Modeling Distance-Dependent Tree Detection Probability Along Transects. IForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry, 17(5), 269–276. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor4588-017
Usmadi, U. (2020). Pengujian Persyaratan Analisis (Uji Homogenitas Dan Uji Normalitas). Inovasi Pendidikan, 7(1), 50–62. https://doi.org/10.31869/ip.v7i1.2281
Velasco-Bautista, E., Gonzalez-Hernandez, A., Romero-Sanchez, M. E., Guerra-De La Cruz, V., & Perez-Miranda, R. (2024). Does It Matter Whether to Use Circular or Square Plots in Forest Inventories? A Multivariate Comparison. Forests, 15(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/f15111847
