Stok Karbon pada Berbagai Umur Kelapa Sawit Perkebunan Kelapa Sawit
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55180/agi.v9i2.2208Keywords:
oil palm, carbon stock, growth stageAbstract
Oil palm plantations are one of the important carbon stocks for climate change mitigation because of their ability to store carbon and absorb free carbon from the air. This study aims to calculate carbon stocks at various stages of oil palm growth. The samples in this study were oil palm producing plants with various age classes; young plants (3-8 years), juvenile plants (9-14 years), and old plants (> 21 years) taken with a sample of 3 plots with 1 plot of 10 trees each in each age class variation using a quadrant (sample plot) plot size of 20 x 60 m with 3 replications. The sampling of understory vegetation was carried out in a measurement plot with a size of 1 m x 1 m as much as 1 sample placed in each plot of oil palm stand biomass measurement. The study was conducted using a carbon stock measurement method with a non-destructive approach using an allometric equation. In young, juvenile, and old oil palm plants. on sample plots according to the predetermined age groups. The research samples were selected by purposive sampling. In each sample, carbon stocks were measured in the oil palm plants and floor vegetation carbon stocks. The results of the study showed that carbon stock analysis showed a close relationship with plant age. Oil palm plant carbon stocks continued to increase with increasing plant age. Therefore, it can be concluded that oil palm biomass increases with increasing age in young plants (3.77 tons/ha), adolescents (12.61tons/ha), and old (>21 years, 167.82 tons/ha).
References
Alfarizi, T., Khalil, M., & Yusnizar, Y. (2023). Kajian Stok Karbon Organik Dan Nitrogen Total Tanah Pada Beberapa Jenis Tanaman Penutup Tanah Di Kebun Kelapa Sawit PT. Perkebunan Nusantara I Kota Langsa. Rona Teknik Pertanian, 16(2), 194–203. https://doi.org/10.17969/rtp.v16i2.34349
Anggraini, S., Afriyanti, N., & Arifin, Y. W. (2022). Pendugaan Cadangan Karbon Kelapa Sawit pada Kelas Umur Tanaman Dewasa dan Tua pada Lahan Tanam Berpirit. In AGRITECH (Issue 1).
Aththorick, T. A. (2005). Kemiripan Komunitas Tumbuhan Bawah pada Beberapa Tipe Ekosistem Perkebunan di Kabupaten Labuhan Batu. Jurnal Komunikasi Penelitian, 17(5), 42–48.
Azizah, F. (2021). Pengaruh Pola Curah Hujan Terhadap Produktivitas Padi di Kecamatan Bukateja Kabupaten Purbalingga. 18(1).
Corley, R. H. V., & Tinker, P. B. (2016). The Palm Oil, Fifth Edition. Willey Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118953297
Gromikora, N., Yahya, S., & Suwarto, D. (2014). Permodelan Pertumbuhan dan Produksi Kelapa Sawit pada Berbagai Taraf Penunasan Pelepah Growth and Production Modeling of Oil Palm at Different Levels of Frond Pruning. In J. Agron. Indonesia (Vol. 42, Issue 3).
Harahap, F. S., Purba, J., & Rauf, A. (2021). Hubungan Curah Hujan dengan Pola Ketersediaan Air Tanah terhadap Produksi Kelapa Sawit (Elaeis guineensis Jacq) di Dataran Tinggi. Agrikultura, 32(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.24198/agrikultura.v32i1.27248
Kurniawan, A., Rusmarini, U. K., & Yuniasih, B. (2018). Kajian Curah Hujan Dan Defisit Air Terhadap Produksi Di Beberapa Divisi Kebun Kelapa Sawit (Elaeis Guineensis Jacq). Jurnal Agromast, 3(1), 5–24.
Nuranisa, S., Sudiana, E., & Yani, E. (2020). Hubungan Umur dengan Stok Karbon Pohon Duku ( Lansium parasiticum ) Di Desa Kalikajar Kecamatan Kaligondang Kabupaten Purbalingga. 2, 146–151.
Purba, J. H. V., & Sipayung, T. (2017). Perkebunan Kelapa Sawit Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Pembangunan Berkelanjutan. Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Indonesia, 43(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14203/jmi.v43i1.717
Tsiwiyati, D. N. (2024). Transformasi Industri Kelapa Sawit : Hilirisasi Berkelanjutan Menghadapi Daya Saing Global dan Ekonomi Hijau. 6(2), 27–45. https://doi.org/10.36841/growth-journal.v21i2.3971
Yahya, S., Mira Ariyanti, & Yenni Asbur. (2022). Perpektif Baru: Manajemen Vegetasi Bawah Tegakan Pada Budidaya Kelapa Sawit Berkelanjutan. Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Agronomy), 50(3), 343–356. https://doi.org/10.24831/jai.v50i3.44605
